In the Hebrew canonical arrangement the former prophets are Joshua, Judges, Samuel, and Kings and the latter prophets are Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, and the Book of the Twelve. The number pattern of 3+1 and 3+1 is a feature of Biblical wisdom literature. Usually the +1 is the punch -- Kings ends with the nation of Judah in exile; the Twelve ends with Malachi announcing the coming Day of YHWH. I would dismiss this shape as simply coincidental, understanding that word in a context of faith, except that we have seen that the structure of the Writings is purposeful and because the Twelve were stitched together to make the pattern work. Should you wonder what the purpose of a wisdom shape to the prophets might suggest -- it is quite simple, study, study, study the written words of the prophets. It is an apologetic for the importance of the study of the written word of God.

It is no surprise, as I have observed elsewhere, that the prophets begin and end with wisdom language that emphasizes studying the Torah. The prophets are therefore styled as wisdom teachers of the written Torah. Joshua says, "Only be strong and very courageous, being careful to do according to all the law that Moses my servant commanded you. Do not turn from it to the right hand or to the left, that you may have good success wherever you go. This Book of the Torah shall not depart from your mouth, but you shall meditate on it day and night, so that you may be careful to do according to all that is written in it. For then you will make your way prosperous, and then you will have good success" (Josh 1:7-8, ESV modified).

Likewise, the ending of Malachi resounds the wisdom theme of studying the written word: "Remember the Torah of my servant Moses, the statutes and rules that I commanded him at Horeb for all Israel" (4:4 in English, ESV modified). Thus the way that the prophets are arranged highlights the way people are to use the prophets until the Day came -- study the written word (and in particular: study them as wisdom teachers of Deuteronomy). One should even wonder if the order throughout Joshua 1 of "Moses, my servant" is purposefully switched for Malachi 4:4 to "my servant Moses." The stress being that the written word of God is God's servant.

It is worth noting that one of the effects of putting the Book of the Twelve last is to give it more importance. It is understandable that particularly Isaiah would be perhaps the most influential book of the latter prophets because of its length. The Twelve gets some extra weight, which is lost in the English Bibles, by being read as a single long book. Moreover, it is the +1 book. And even furthermore it is the final book of the Prophets. All of these considerations promote studying the Twelve more than they often are. But like the Writings, sometimes cited by the first book the Psalms, citing Isaiah (or occasionally Jeremiah) is often shorthand for citing the latter Prophets in general.

The Book of the Twelve was stitched together and it follows a discernible geographical pattern -- north (Hosea to Israel), south (Joel to Judah), north (Amos primarily to Israel), south (Obadiah to Edom), north (Jonah to Ninevah), south (Micah to Judah), north (Nahum to Ninevah), south (Habakkuk to Judah), south (Zephaniah to Judah). Then the last three after the restoration of Jerusalem has begun (Haggai, Zechariah, and Malachi) are concerned with priestly things, which mirrors the emphasis on priests in the wisdom tradition since they taught Torah. The latter Prophets moves in this direction as a whole in that the last two books are Ezekiel and the Book of the Twelve. But the point here is that the Book of the Twelve has a purposeful order like drawing a spiral in to Jerusalem. It should be no surprise then that the gospel reverses this by going from Jerusalem, to Judea, to Samaria and the ends of the earth.

By the way, in the Hebrew Bible the scribes saw the Book of the Twelve as one whole book and made it clear by putting only three spaces instead of four between each one and by giving statistics on the whole.

So we have 3+1 and 3+1. The hero of Kings (the +1 of the former prophets) will return before the coming of the Day (as noted in the +1 of the latter prophets: Malachi 4:5-6, English). Until then, study the written word of these wisdom teachers of Torah. And now that this Elijah has come as John the Baptist and the +1 (eighth) day has begun with the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ, continue to study the written word until the seventh day is done.

Labels: book of the twelve, deuteronomy, joshua, malachi, prophets, writings

As earlier posts make clear, the canonical order of the books of Scripture makes a difference in how we read them. Thus I want to explore the effect of Deuteronomy's position in the Torah as the last book without repeating observations made in previous posts like Old and New Testament Torah, Prophets & Writings and The Way of Wisdom: The Canon and Cessation. If you have not read those posts, please do so before continuing with this one.

Simply put, the effect of putting Deuteronomy last is to make it the most important. This is reflected in later Scripture. For example, whenever the Prophets refer to Torah (or the longer form 'Torah of Moses') they are referring not to the canonical designation for Genesis through Deuteronomy but they are referring to the Book of Deuteronomy. The late Al Groves researched each of these references to "Torah" and concluded that every one of them was a reference to Deuteronomy. Moreover, the most quoted book of the Torah in the New Testament is Deuteronomy.

But it is actually a little more complicated than this. Deuteronomy shows us the shift from the spoken Torah of Moses to the written Torah of Moses. As noted elsewhere, not every word of the written Torah of Moses was written by Moses. In fact, the written Torah of Moses was undoubtedly edited later, has an updated vocabulary throughout, and has the extra poem and epilogue telling us about the death of Moses written from the standpoint of the cessation of prophecy. On the updated vocabulary Pete Enns notes as he reflects on the comments of an unnamed Old Testament scholar: "The specific point concerned the state of Hebrew in the 2nd millennium BC, and how no one living at that time (i.e., Moses) could have written the Pentateuch as we know it, as it reflects a state of Hebrew that did not develop until the 1st millennium" (see II). But for our purposes here, the effect is to highlight the editor(s)' comments and especially the editor(s)' conclusion. This is fitting for the gospel genre because the NT Torah was not written down by Jesus and so you will see this similarity between Deuteronomy and Matthew-John. Deuteronomy is most like John because it assumes you know the story (a point that I could develop further).

This same effect is observable in the Hebrew Scriptures as a whole because the Prophets interpret Torah and show more acts of God and then the Writings interpret the Torah and Prophets. Likewise in the New Testament as particularly the epistles (writings) interpret the significance of the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ (gospels, NT Torah) and the giving of the Spirit on Pentecost (Acts, NT Prophets). Each Torah is foundational to the rest and so it is most important in that respect. Though no Christian would dispute that the effect of the Gospels coming later makes them more important. In the Old Testament, it is also clear that God spoke to Moses face to face but to the later prophets and especially to the writers this revelation becomes increasingly indirect. But we cannot underestimate the impact for those living just before and at the time of Christ to have the canon in this order. It was the Writings that showed you how to interpret the written Torah for your new situation.

We see this even in the Torah because what Deuteronomy does is show us the torah (instruction) adapted to a new generation. There are a variety of inconsistencies between the laws found earlier and found in Deuteronomy (many of which simply reflect a later situation, this cannot be said of all the differences). McConville notes in his commentary in the AOTC series that Deuteronomy is concerned to apply torah (instruction of Moses) to not only the Moab generation but also to all generations (cf. p.136). The point being that the book is concerned for transmission of the Decalogue and all the torah (instruction including law and history) of the Torah to future generations. As Deuteronomy itself demonstrates, this transmission requires teaching and interpretation (concerns highlighted by the editor of Deuteronomy who promotes the priests as teachers of written Torah).

So in summary the effect of Deuteronomy being the last book of the Torah is to make the equation of Deuteronomy and Torah. That is, Torah = Deuteronomy. And to emphasize that the Torah must be taught and interpreted for every new generation by wisdom teachers. Thus the spoken words of Moses are not nearly as important, even though the book consists of three major speeches, as the written book of Deuteronomy. And so we should pay careful attention and highlight any comments made by the editor(s) as we proceed through our investigation of this Torah especially noting his fascination with giants (something I remember Al Groves noting).

As a final point for now, just as when you read the New Testament and find the end of the story and then go back and re-read the Old Testament to see how it points to the end, you should also re-read the whole Torah from Genesis to Numbers after you have read Deuteronomy. Deuteronomy is inviting you to do this. It is assuming that you know the story of Numbers in particular and is encouraging you to read it again. But it is also inviting you to compare the Decalogue in Exodus with the new presentation in Deuteronomy and so forth. May this observation keep you studying Torah in a loop so long as you keep seeing the one who is its subject: Jesus Christ.

Labels: canon, deuteronomy, gospel genre, prophets, torah, writings

Exodus, Leviticus and Numbers are tied together because the Israelites arrived at Sinai with Exo 19:1 and began their journey from Sinai with Num 10:11. Thus the beginning of Numbers is meant to be read as a continuation of the story of Exodus and Leviticus. The reason for the title Numbers sticking is the census taking in the book. However, the Hebrew title, "In the wilderness [desert]" is more appropriate because the people begin the book in the desert and end the book in the desert. In Deuteronomy too, they are not yet in the land at the end. Therefore, the story of the Torah (Old Testament Gospels) in an of itself is incomplete and needs the Prophets (Old Testament Acts) just as the Gospels (New Testament Torah) awaited the giving of the Spirit in Acts (New Testament Prophets).

"In the Wilderness" is an Old Testament Gospel teaching "that the Christ should suffer and on the third day rise from the dead, and that repentance and forgiveness of sins should be proclaimed in his name to all nations, beginning from Jerusalem" and promising the Spirit on the Pentecost after Jesus' resurrection (Luke 24:46-49). The book tells us about two generations of Israel. The first characterized by unbelief and the second by faith. This section is the necessary background we need for the first generation.

The book begins with the setting "in the wilderness of Sinai" and "in the tent of meeting" and with the timing of day one, month two, year two after leaving Egypt (Num 1:1). You may remember that the calendar begins with the Exodus event. So this is two years and one full month later. But the timing of the Passover celebration recorded later, also "in the wilderness of Sinai" is day fourteen, month one, year two after leaving Egypt (Num 9:1-5). Fourteen is seven times two. But the point is that Num 9 takes place before Num 1, chronologically speaking.

The section starts well. The people stood up to be counted for holy war (Num 1:3). Those numbered were men twenty years old and up able to go to war. A man was called from each tribe to help. There are twelve tribes (this does not include the tribe of Levi, but does include both children of Joseph so that you still get twelve). Reuben had 46,500 (Num 1:21), Simeon had 59,300 (Num 1:23), Gad had 45,650 (Num 1:25), Judah had 74,600 (Num 1:27), Issachar had 54,400 (Num 1:29), Zebulun 57,400 (Num 1:31), Ephraim 40,500 (Num 1:33), Manasseh 32,200 (Num 1:35), Benjamin 35,400 (Num 1:37), Dan 62,700 (Num 1:39), Asher 41,500 (Num 1:41), Naphtali 53,400 (Num 1:43), plus the twelve who helped totals 603,550 (Num 1:46). The census follows a clear narrative pattern making it somewhat repetitious. It should not be surprising that Judah is most populous and even adding the two sons of Joseph together comes just short of Judah.

The order of the tribes in Num 1 is strange on first reading. Both the list of assistants and each tribe's census follows the same order except for Gad. The assistant's order of Dan, Asher, Gad, Naphtali is odd because they are not grouped by their mother or birth-order. The assistant's order follows their natural ranking among the sons of Jacob but the random order of these last four is another way of indicating their lesser status. In the census order itself, the movement of Gad to follow Reuben and Simeon prepares us for what will follow next (all as Iain Duguid observes in his commentary, p.41).

The second chapter shows the tabernacle at the center and the tribes arranged around it. Thus the tent of the King in the Ancient Near East is at the center (in other words, God is king). We mentioned this previously in the post about the tabernacle as heaven on earth on Exodus 25-31 and 35-40. But here we can add this observation Duguid makes: east of the tabernacle are the children of Leah (Issachar, Judah, and Zebulun), south of the tabernacle are the child of maidservants (Gad) and cursed children (Reuben and Simeon), west of the tabernacle are the children of Rachel (Manasseh, Ephraim, and Benjamin), and north of the tabernacle are the children of maidservants (Naphtali, Dan, and Asher). Thus there are three tribes on each side with the one in the middle leading that section.

Duguid also notes that the Levites are also arranged around the tabernacle with the priests on the east, the Kohathites carrying the most holy things on the south even though Kohath was Gershon's younger brother, the Gershonites carrying the holy things on the west, and the Merarites carrying the least holy things on the north. This arrangement is helpful for understanding later scenes like Num 16.

Duguid says, "Both elements that define the church -- the boundary and the center -- are important" (p.37). He calls the people of God "an edge-bounded group" who stand up to be counted (church membership) and "a center-focused group" who keep God at the center. Both ideas need to be held together: "your God will be my God and your people will be my people." Ultimately, Jesus is the boundary and the center -- that is, we are in Christ (boundary) and Jesus is Lord (center).

A genealogy of the sons of Aaron follows in the third chapter even reminding us of the fire incident (Num 3:4). The Levites belonged to God in place of the firstborn of each household (Num 3:12-13). They had guard duty with regard to the sanctuary and its furnishings but not military duty and so they were not counted in the census but they are numbered for this duty. Their guard duty included living between the people and the tabernacle to guard the people from it. There were 22,000 Levite males a month old and up (Lev 3:39) and there were 22,273 firstborn males in Israel (Num 3:43). Therefore, the other 273 had to be redeemed (Num 3:46ff). The Levitical sons of Kohath were then numbered in a census from age 30-50 (Num 4:2-3). These things were to prepare them to move the sanctuary on the journey. The same was done for the Levitical sons of Gershon (Num 4:22-23) and Merari (Num 4:29-30) for the same purpose.

Numbers 5 gives us some legal case studies in a narrative framework. First, they are to put the unclean outside the camp. Second, if they "break faith" they are to confess their sin and make restitution. And the third case is a special ordeal trial with water of bitterness for women suspected of adultery. Duguid classifies these cases as "sin as defilement," "sin as transgression," and "sin as unfaithfulness." And points the reader to Jesus as the solution to each.

Numbers 6 relates to us the Nazirite Vow. Duguid describes Nazarites as "a kind of temporary lay priest" (p.79). The Nazirites were set apart to YHWH by being set apart from alcohol and grapes, haircuts, and dead bodies (even immediate family). They are to be a microcosm of Israel, the kingdom of priests. The steps for cleansing are also mentioned should someone die suddenly in his presence and the steps for his offerings when the vow is complete are also described. And the Aaronic blessing is given, "YHWH bless you and keep you; YHWH make his face to shine upon you and be gracious to you; YHWH lift up his countenance upon you and give you peace" (Num 6:24-26). This was the blessing for the people of God.

Numbers 7 tells us about the twelve days of offerings in thanksgiving for the consecration of the tabernacle. The order of these offerings was from Judah, Issachar, Zebulon, Reuben, Simeon, Gad, Ephraim, Manasseh, Benjamin, Dan, Asher, and Naphtali. We can observe that they went in order from east, south, west, and north and by priority (thus Simeon before Gad and Manasseh before Benjamin, etc.) Afterwards an offering to set apart the Levites as the firstborn was given.

The whole section is set apart not only by location but also by the concluding phrase: "I am YHWH your God" (Num 10:10), a fitting way to end given its structural significance to ending paragraphs and other sections in the book of Leviticus.

Labels: census, gospel genre, membership, numbers, prophets, torah, tribes

1 Peter 1:10 "Concerning this salvation, the prophets who prophesied about the grace that was to be yours searched and inquired carefully, 11 inquiring what person or time the Spirit of Christ in them was indicating when he predicted the sufferings of Christ and the subsequent glories. 12 It was revealed to them that they were serving not themselves but you, in the things that have now been announced to you through those who preached the good news to you by the Holy Spirit sent from heaven, things into which angels long to look." (ESV)

Peter, like Paul, thinks in redemptive-historical categories.

The third reason Peter gives for blessing God is that we have a time-place of privilege and advantage above the prophets and angels. This place of privilege is redemptive-historical - that is, we are at an advantage because we live after Christ's death/resurrection/Pentecost event-complex. The apostles, including Peter, are the ones Peter mentions when he says "those who preached the good news to you by the Holy Spirit sent from heaven" (1:12b). Peter's audience is at an advantage because the apostles preached the good news to them. Old Testament heralds : Old Testament Audience :: Apostles : Peter's Audience and us. Except the Apostles are at an advantage compared to the Old Testament heralds (prophets and angels) and the apostle's audience is at an advantage compared to not only the Old Testament audience but also the Old Testament heralds (prophets and angels).

This is perhaps clearest with regards to the prophets. The Old Testament, to summarize, is about the sufferings and the subsequent glories of Christ. The prophets were searching and inquiring carefully trying to discover what the Spirit of Christ within them was revealing. What person or time was the Spirit of Christ indicating? The answer was that the prophets were serving the people who would live in this time - the time after the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ and giving of the Spirit on Pentecost. People may think nostalgically as if it would be great to live in the time of the prophets but that can only mean that they do not appreciate just how privileged they are to live in this time. All of the Old Testament prophets would have preferred to live and proclaim the gospel today. They were looking forward to the accomplishment of redemption in history whereas the apostles were able to announce that it is finished. So those who hear the message of the apostles are in a better position compared to the prophets.

The reason Peter's audience is in a better position compared to the angels is that the angels gave the law (according to tradition) whereas the apostles gave the gospel. Those given the gospel are in a far better place in the history of salvation than those who were given the law (Israel). And those given the gospel are in a far better place than those who gave the law (the angels).

That the angels gave the law is a tradition also assumed by Stephen's speech in Acts 7:53 "you who received the law as delivered by angels and did not keep it" and Paul in Galatians 3:19 "Why then the law? It was added because of transgressions, until the offspring should come to whom the promise had been made, and it was put in place through angels by an intermediary."

So then the prophets and angels were associated with the Old Testament dispensation and were thus looking forward to hear the message that the apostles were able to deliver. Therefore, Peter's audience is at a time-place of privilege compared to the Old Testament audience and the Old Testament heralds (the prophets and angels). The difference between the prophets and angels being that the angels would still be able to look into these things and hear the announcement of the apostles.

This difference might lead someone to object because the implication is that the prophets inquired (in the past) but the angels long to look (in the present). So perhaps I am reading into the text a redemptive-historical contrast with regards to the angels to the apostles when the passage only means to highlight the redemptive-historical contrast of the prophets to the apostles. Nevertheless, reading into the text a redemptive-historical contrast with regards to the angels and apostles is the natural next step to take (a reader at the time would associate the mention of angels with the giving of the law). The reason the angels are longing to look in the present is that they were the ones who gave Israel the law. Regardless, the apostles are in a better position than the angels because the apostles proclaimed the gospel and the angels listen. The redemptive-historical contrast helps us to explain why Peter's audience is in a better position than the angels even though they get to hear it too. Some may even wish to object and somehow identify the prophets of the passage as New Testament prophets, but this objection has been adequately addressed by other commentators.

Thinking redemptive-historically is the greatest advancement in biblical interpretation in Reformed circles in the Twentieth Century. Our Bible is not flat - it was not dropped out of heaven all at once. God has engaged us in history. Thanks be to God for Biblical Theology opening our eyes to such great truths.

Labels: angels, prophecy, prophets, redemptive-historical interpretation

John H. Sailhamer's Introduction to Old Testament Theology, lays out the argument that we are developing and building upon (we are especially adding its relevance for the Christian).

The shape of the Hebrew Scriptures (Torah-Prophets-Writings, see the posting below) is intentional and apologetic. It marks a historical shift from the spoken word of God (sometimes alongside the written) to the written exclusively. And it marks a shift from prophets to wise men (wisdom teachers). The shape of the Hebrew canon was meant to guide the faithful Israelite to wisdom to know the will of God for their life between the cessation of prophecy and the return of the prophet Elijah and then the prophet greater than Moses.

The way the Torah-Prophets-Writings are stitched together reveals this agenda, which is from God.

Torah: The compositional strategy of Genesis is easily seen when one observes where the poems fall within the text. The same pattern is also true on a larger level in the Torah. Genesis itself has as its finale a poem and then an epilogue. Numbers and Deuteronomy do the same. Each of the epilogues looks forward to the next leader within Israel.

However, in Deuteronomy there is then a second poem and a second epilogue written from the perspective of the editor of the canon. In them Moses is dead. This is traditionally one of the most controversial issues of Torah scholarship - how can one say that Moses wrote it if Moses died during it. The answer: Moses did not write the second poem and second epilogue, which do not fit the original compositional strategy of the Torah but clearly betray a later redaction. This later edit is fully the word of God as well as fully the words of this editor. The second poem repeats themes from the Genesis 49 poem. But here the role of the Levites are treated more comprehensively - because the Levites teach the written word to the people [the Levites are wise men, wisdom teachers]. The poem says,

"They shall teach Jacob your rules and Israel your Torah" (Deut 33:10).

The second epilogue reveals the editor's intentions by describing Joshua as

"full of the Spirit of wisdom" (34:9).

The agenda is to make Joshua more like a wisdom teacher than a prophet. That this is written when prophecy has ceased in Israel (for at least 400 years before Christ came) and when it was not expected to resume until the end is clear from the next verse.

"And there has not arisen a prophet since in Israel like Moses, whom YHWH knew face to face" (Deut 34:10) and "none like him for all the signs and wonders that YHWH sent him to do" (Deut 34:11-12).

Thus concludes the Torah. No prophet greater than Moses has appeared. Prophecy has ceased. Look to Wisdom to know the will of God for your decision-making.

Prophets: The canon editor then stitched this together with the Prophets section. Joshua, opening the prophets, is portrayed as a wisdom leader. God tells Joshua,

"Only be strong and very courageous, being careful to do according to all the Torah, which Moses my servant commanded you. Do not turn from it to the right hand or to the left, that you may have good success wherever you go" (Josh 1:7).

Not turning to the right or to the left is wisdom language, and the promise that this will bring success is common in wisdom literature. As if to make this connection to wisdom concrete, the introduction to Joshua continues in this vein,

"This Book of the Torah shall not depart from your mouth, but you shall meditate on it day and night, so that you may be careful to do according to all that is written in it. For then you will make your way prosperous, and then you will have good success" (Josh 1:8).

Here we see the move from the spoken word of the prophet to the written word ("the book of the Torah" that you meditate upon) and we see the wisdom themes continue.

The Prophets ends with the Book of the Twelve, concluding with Malachi. The shape of the latter prophets within the Prophets moves in the direction of priestly concerns. Ezekiel would have been a priest and shows deep concern for priestly issues and the Book of the Twelve shows the same movement because the last three books are concerned with priestly issues. Malachi, for example, focuses on the job of the priests as teaching the Torah:

"True instruction was in his [Levi] mouth, and no wrong was found on his lips. He walked with me in peace and uprightness, and he turned many from iniquity. For the lips of a priest should guard knowledge, and people should seek Torah from his mouth, for he is the messenger of YHWH of hosts" (Mal 2:6-7).

Malachi ends with these words, though they are not necessary for the book on its own,

"Remember the Torah of my servant Moses, the statutes and rules that I commanded him at Horeb for all Israel. Behold, I will send Elijah the prophet before the great and awesome day of YHWH comes. And he will turn the hearts of fathers to their children and the hearts of children to their fathers, lest I come and strike the land with a decree of utter destruction" (devoted to destruction) (Mal 4:4-6 in English Bible).

Here the editor concludes the Prophets on much the same note that he concluded the Torah. The prophet greater than Moses has not appeared (it was not Elijah). Prophecy has ceased, adding that it will return with the return of Elijah before the coming of the prophet greater than Moses. Until then, look to Wisdom (study Scripture) to know the will of God for your decision-making.

The editor stitched the Prophets to the Writings just like he did the Torah to the Prophets. These seams are parallel.

Writings: The writings open with Psalm 1. Of course, Psalms 1 & 2 serve as an introduction to the entirety of the book of Psalms. This book has been compiled intentionally as well. But for our purposes remember that Psalm 1 is much like the opening to Joshua.

Psalm 1: Blessed is the man who walks not in the counsel of the wicked, nor stands in the way of sinners, nor sits in the seat of scoffers; 2 but his delight is in the law of the LORD, and on his law he meditates day and night. 3 He is like a tree planted by streams of water that yields its fruit in its season, and its leaf does not wither. In all that he does, he prospers. 4 The wicked are not so, but are like chaff that the wind drives away. 5 Therefore the wicked will not stand in the judgment, nor sinners in the congregation of the righteous; 6 for the LORD knows the way of the righteous, but the way of the wicked will perish (ESV).

Here again the way of wisdom is presented and the righteous wisdom teacher meditates on the Torah of YHWH day and night - and he prospers.



How is this relevant for those who live on this side of the New Testament canon?

The Old Testament is shaped to answer the question: "How do I know the will of the Lord when prophecy has ceased?" Now that we have a complete New Testament canon, with nothing to add or subtract, and prophecy has again ceased, "How do I know the will of the Lord?" Study the Torah, Prophets, Writings (Old and New). Study the written word of God under wisdom teachers because that has replaced the spoken word of the prophets. The written word is sufficient - we need nothing more to know the will of God for our salvation or to make any decision. We have the advantage of the Holy Spirit poured out on all flesh - the Wisdom of God is in our hearts and can show us the way of wisdom as a rule by using the written word of God. How do we know when one Proverb applies and another does not? This is a wisdom question. Wisdom is the paradigm for Christian living during this time between the end of prophecy (the end of the New Testament era) and the return of Jesus Christ.

This conclusion of course is not one that my Pentecostal friends (of which I have many here in Appalachia) can follow: they believe that the infallible spoken word still is to sought for direction from the Lord. They will often say, "the Lord told me to say..." or "the Lord has revealed to me...." But prophecy has ceased, just as it did before. I do not deny that God will work with some people non-discursively (bypassing teaching) but He does not do so infallibly today just as discursive prophecy (preaching) is not infallible today. Yet the shape of the Scriptures clearly show the advantages of the latter. Much more important is this consideration: NT writings like Ephesians do not describe being filled with the Holy Spirit as being someone who speaks in tongues or does other special prophecy but instead they say the Spirit-filled address one another in psalms, hymns, and spiritual songs; sing; make melody; give thanks to God; and the Spirit-filled household is a place of mutual submission (Eph 5).

As an additional note for those interested in the discipline of Biblical Theology: this makes a way for us to appreciate the role of wisdom literature. The question had always been: "How do books like Proverbs fit into Biblical Theology?" This gives these texts a place in redemptive history - they speak to how to live during the era between prophecy's cessation and Christ's arrival just as they point forward to an era of prophecy's cessation and Christ's return. Thus the almost instinctive drive to put Proverbs in pocket NT's is very wise indeed.

3 May 2008: I would like to add that in seminary we looked rather extensively at the hints within the NT that prophecy would cease with the end of the apostolic age. I was reading something that said the writings are always the last to be received as part of the canon -- this was true with the OT writings as well as the NT writings. Revelation was one of the last books to receive recognition as being within the canon. And it was part of the writings, but not just placed anywhere within the writings, it was put last. It is noteworthy then that Revelation ends this way:

"I warn everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this book: if anyone adds to them, God will add to him the plagues described in this book, and if anyone takes away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God will take away his share in the tree of life and in the holy city, which are described in this book. He who testifies to these things says, "Surely I am coming soon." Amen. Come, Lord Jesus! The grace of the Lord Jesus be with all. Amen" (Rev 22:18-21, ESV).

What a fitting end to the NT canon. Like the ending of OT Torah and Prophets it acknowledges the gap between the end of canon and the coming of the Christ. And thus it serves as an appropriate end to the book as well as to the NT writings. Moreover, its warning about adding or subtracting from the book also then applies to the whole canon. This is my primary issue with the error of pentecostalism, it has to do with Scripture's own doctrine of Scripture, for infallible prophecy to continue is to add to Scripture. The problem is pastoral -- how can I help you discover the will of God to make decisions in your life? Wisdom, not prophecy, is the answer Scripture gives. And we discern wisdom in the community of faith -- thus issues of calling require both an internal and external call.

Labels: bible, biblical theology, book of the twelve, canon, cessationism, deuteronomy, elijah, Genesis, hebrew scriptures, joshua, malachi, moses, pentecostalism, prophets, psalms, sailhamer, torah, wisdom

OT Canonical Order assumed in the NT: Jesus said,

"everything written about me in the Law of Moses [Torah] and the Prophets and the Psalms [Writings] must be fulfilled" (Luke 24:44).

The Psalms, the first and largest book of the writings section, is often used to refer to all of the writings. And Jesus said to the scribes and Pharisees,

"on you may come all the righteous blood shed on earth, from the blood of innocent Abel to the blood of Zechariah the son of Barachiah, whom you murdered between the sancturary and the altar" (Matt 23:35).

Jesus is refering to the first book Genesis (where Abel is the first death) and the last book of the Hebrew canon Chronicles (where this Zechariah is the last death). Thus he is using this as shorthand for all of the righteous saints who died in the Old Testament Scriptures. Jesus assumed the OT canonical order stated below.

It is the order found in Jewish Bibles. Thus, the Hebrew Scriptures are often called the Tanakh (in Hebrew, T is for Torah, N for Prophets, K for Writings). Here the Westminster Confession of Faith could use some reformation as it lists the Old Testament books in a different order reflected also in English language translations of the Bible. Notice that the New Testament follows the same God-given pattern...

Torah: In the beginning (Genesis); Exodus; Leviticus; In the wilderness (Numbers); and These are the words (Deuteronomy). The phrases are the Hebrew titles (the first word in the Hebrew text).

Prophets: Joshua; Judges; Samuel; Kings; Isaiah; Jeremiah; Ezekiel; The Book of the Twelve (Hosea, Joel, Amos, Obadiah, Jonah, Micah, Nahum, Habakkuk, Zephaniah, Haggai, Zechariah, Malachi).

Writings: Psalms, Job, Proverbs, Ruth, Song of Songs, Qoheleth (Ecclesiastes), Lamentations, Esther, Daniel, Ezra-Nehemiah, Chronicles.

New Testament Torah: Matthew, Mark, Luke and John

New Testament Prophets: Acts

New Testament Writings: Romans, 1 Corinthians, 2 Corinthians, Galatians, Ephesians, Philippians, Colossians, 1 Thessalonians, 2 Thessalonians, 1 Timothy, 2 Timothy, Titus, Philemon, Hebrews, James, 1 Peter, 2 Peter, 1 John, 2 John, 3 John, Jude, Revelation.

Eugene Peterson suggests that Acts is partially Torah and partially Prophets, making the fifth book of NT Torah. Then he makes most of the epistles Prophets while James and Revelation are writings. Sometimes I am persuaded by this argument.

Early comments: As you might guess, you can compare the Books of Moses to the gospels and Joshua to Acts. And putting them this way helps you see why Daniel and Revelation have so much in common -- they are both apocalyptic (genre) writings (section). Nevertheless, do not flatten the Bible and ignore the historical nature of special revelation.

First observation: Old Testament books that have been divided in the English Bible into two should be read as one book. For example, 1 Kings and 2 Kings is one book as is 1 Chronicles and 2 Chronicles. One you might not realize is that Ezra-Nehemiah is also one book. And it is very important to read the so-called minor prophets instead of as separate books as The Book of the Twelve. They have been edited together to be read as a single book. It would also be appropriate, though divided in the order of the New Testament, to read Luke and Acts as one book. The reason that the gospel of John divides them in our canon is that John is assuming that you already know the stories we can find in Matthew, Mark & Luke. Thus he writes a book that reflects much more theologically on the life of Christ.

It is worth noting, unlike in the OT the 1 Letter, 2 Letter, 3 Letter designations in the NT are indeed separate letters and should be read as such but putting them next to one another also encourages you to see the connections between them. In this order the authors of the epistles are separated: Romans through Philemon are by Paul, Hebrews is by an unknown author, James, Peter, John, and Jude are as the names suggest.

Second observation: You should read Scripture according to these divisions (Torah, Prophets, Writings, Old and New). How you read the OT Torah is different than how you read the OT Writings.

To build on this observation: Each book needs a unique reading strategy and knowing where they fall in the canoncial order helps. One thing that is necessary for interpretation is to identify the kind of writing (the genre) that you are reading. You read a grocery list differently than a love letter and a fable different than a history textbook. And so you should read Matthew differently than Revelation and Psalms differently than Isaiah. Not every scholar will agree on the genre of a text. For example, one person might say that you should read Deuteronomy like you would read the gospels. It contains his speeches but it also includes information that is likely told by someone telling us the story. Another will mention that the book resembles an ancient treaty formula. Actually both of these observations are helpful for Deuteronomy, especially the former given our discussion. Knowing which section of the canon a book falls into will help you to identify the genre. For another example, Daniel is a wisdom book (found in the writings alongside other wisdom books) and not one of the prophetic books. This does not mean that Daniel does not include prophecy but it does mean that you should read it differently than one of the prophetic books. It is a failure to recognize this truth that has led to all sorts of interpretive mistakes.

Third Observation: And when we read the books in order we should also interpret them in order, thus Ruth and the woman in Song of Songs are examples of the virtuous woman of Proverbs 31 (in the Hebrew order it is Proverbs, Ruth, Song of Songs).

May you read Scripture afresh. Amen.

Labels: bible, book of the twelve, canon, daniel, deuteronomy, ezra-nehemiah, hebrew scriptures, prophets, proverbs 31, psalms, ruth, scripture, song of songs, Tanakh, torah, writings